Re-thinking Performance Reviews

This Blog has been moved. 

You can find this post on: https://culture-hacking.squarespace.com/

2 comments

  1. Jon

    For time immemorial ratings have been a bugbear.

    Interesting article Joris. I like a lot of your points. For the most part, this matches what I consider to be good practice, see http://www.cognology.com.au/HowDoesPMWork.htm. The one-on-one is critical.

    You’ve said you’ve removed the unconstructive focus on ratings. The two axis approach is interesting. Often managers will overrate a person using a traditional approach to acknowledge effort. Your approach provides a way to avoid this. Are you using the two axis approach to drive bonus, or does everyone get a bonus based on some other criteria?

    I totally agree about the 360 review. I think it should be done at the start of a performance cycle, rather than the end. Partly so people can focus on it without having the distraction of potential pay increase/bonus, but also because it should be largely about development.

  2. Pingback: Wait, only 5 boxes for performance review questions? | Small Improvements Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: